Age diversity looms large

How to profit from America’s older workforce

By Michael Carrillo

The nation’s work force is getting older. According to the Census Bureau, by decade’s end the share of people aged 45 to 64 will leap 16 percent, to more than one American in four. These numbers mean that the new frontier in diversity is managing a multi-generational workforce.

Too many companies are not prepared to make the most of America’s aging workforce. And that’s a shame, because it not only shortchanges older workers but American business.

Many executives – even older ones – have misconceptions about older workers. One of the most common is that they cannot or will not learn new skills. My experience in the CPG/retail industry shows just the opposite.

Most workers in their 40s and 50s are familiar with new technologies and methods. Many were early adopters of the PC in the 80s and the Internet in the 90s, and most stay current with industry trends. It may sound counter-intuitive, but adaptability to change is a factor in favor of older employees – they can accept change precisely because they’ve been through more of it.

More stable

Another myth about older workers is that they don’t stay as long on the job as long as younger hires. In fact, executives 45 to 54 stay on the job twice as long as those 25 to 34, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Then there’s the myth that older employees take more sick days. Actually, attendance is better among older executives. They have, as a group, a better work ethic.

And while older workers may command higher salaries than less experienced colleagues, it is another myth that they cost organizations more in the long run. When you balance their advantages in experience, productivity, attendance and reduced training and turnover, they are worth every additional dollar. Besides, in today’s soft employment market, older managers will often gratefully accept salaries lower than you might expect.

The biggest myth

The biggest and most harmful myth about older workers is that they are “set in their ways.” This prejudice is hard to counter because it is so subtle. But research shows that older managers accept change as readily as younger workers, especially when the purpose of the change is explained.

Older managers have seen what works and what doesn’t. It is shortsighted to turn the greatest advantage of older workers against them. Experience is not a disadvantage, but a great asset you can tap into. You can’t have real diversity without the diversity that age and experience bring.

Many executives look at someone older and assume that their best days are behind them. I think that’s a mistake. It’s important to look beyond conventional wisdom and see the person underneath.

Sixty the new forty

They say that “60 is the new 40,” and today’s health- and trend-conscious “baby boomers” certainly feel and act younger than their middle-aged parents did.

Senior business and government leaders have always worked well past retirement age (Dial CEO Herbert Baum is 67, investor Warren Buffet is 74 and Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan is 78, to cite just a few). By what reasoning are energetic executives years younger than this considered “over the hill?”

As the American workforce continues to age in the next decade, executives in their 40s, 50s and even 60s will defy assumptions about them and prove a great strategic edge for employers who have the vision to hire them. Older managers are one of the great under-utilized resources today. Giving them a chance isn’t just good HR policy, it’s good business.


Michael Carrillo is president of CPGjoblist, the CPG industry’s leading candidate referral system  for HR professionals and employers. You may contact him at Michael@cpgjoblist.com or call (626) 398-5381.

 

© Copyright 2007 by the Network of Executive Women. All rights reserved.